In doing research on leveling
books, I have found many articles that argue both views. The one that I prefer to side with, however,
is that I am for leveling books. Because
I want to be a special education teaching working with primarily students with
autism I can understand why giving a child a book that is on their level as
opposed to a book that the entire class is reading would be helpful. I recognize the amount of frustration a child
feels when the work given to them is too difficult. I have also seen a student’s face filled with
disappointment when they do not grasp a concept, as well as the look of joy and
pride when they do.
In order to level a book, a
teacher will listen to a student read a given piece of literature. If the student makes 0-1 mistakes the book is
too easy, 2-5 mistakes per 100 words, the piece is deemed “instructional”. If the student makes 6 or more mistakes, this
indicates that the book is in the frustration level for the student. If a student reads a book that is in their
frustration level, they would be offered a variety of books that are more in
their instructional level instead. I
believe that by allowing a student to read a book at his or her instructional
level will let them read independently and enjoy reading. I think it will also allow the language of
the student to grow and become more skillful.
In growing and becoming more skillful, the student will rise to a higher
reading level. If we lump all the
students into one level, we will see frustration levels sky rocket. I have seen students in classrooms who are
not able to understand what they are reading.
Hell, I was one of those students.
I can remember reading H.G. Wells’ The Time Machine in 4th
grade and feeling so lost when asked a comprehension question.
I believe that leveling books
will not only help the typical population of students, but will also help the
special education population. As I wrote
earlier, I want to be a special education teacher working primarily with
students with autism. For the past 12
years, I have been a tutor to this population and have seen pride and
disappointment my students have felt. I
have also seen great frustration when a skill is not mastered. If students are allowed to read books on
their level, opportunities for inclusion will increase. Special education students will have a more
meaningful experience in the general education classroom. These students will be able to spend more time
with their typical peers and feel more a part of the classroom.
I understand the good ideas that
come with the Common Core, but I do not believe that getting rid of leveled
books is one of them. The benefits of
keeping this idea are too great.
Students will be able to progress at their own level, and learn to enjoy
reading. They will also be able to feel
a sense of pride when they can work independently and thrive at it. I believe that by continuing the level books,
the special education population can participate more and be part of the
general education classroom.
Hi Stacey!
ReplyDeleteAfter reading your blog on leveled books, I have learned more about leveled reading. I like how in your blog you make personal connections with how you as a teacher would use leveled books in special education. It is nice to see a future teacher who cares for the students' well being and success not only relying on set standards. The one thing I suggest is that you site the website that you found your information, one so it is sited and two, so us as readers can read your research especially for the ones who want more information. Great Job!
Strong argument and good use of evidence. I am glad you walked your audience to the conclusion of using leveled books only in special education settings and not in everyday classrooms.
ReplyDeleteHow do you feel about it though in the K-2 setting where reading levels are so vastly different?